A PhD-Level Reinterpretation of the 4P and 7P Marketing Mix Frameworks in Contemporary Strategy

The marketing mix remains one of the most enduring and widely taught frameworks in marketing theory and practice. Despite repeated critiques that it oversimplifies complex market dynamics, the framework persists because it provides a structured way to translate strategy into operational decisions. Originating in the mid-twentieth century, the 4P Marketing Mix was designed to help firms systematically manage controllable variables in pursuit of market objectives. As economies shifted from goods-dominant logic toward service-dominant logic, the framework expanded into the 7P model, reflecting the growing importance of human interaction, experiential value, and organizational processes. A PhD-level examination of the 4P and 7P frameworks requires moving beyond managerial checklists to understand their epistemological roots, strategic assumptions, and adaptive potential in contemporary markets.

Intellectual Origins of the 4P Marketing Mix

The conceptual foundations of the marketing mix can be traced to early marketing thought that sought to professionalize managerial decision-making. Neil Borden’s articulation of the “marketing mix” framed marketing as a combination of ingredients that managers could adjust to influence demand. Jerome McCarthy later synthesized these ingredients into the now-canonical four categories of Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. This simplification was not merely pedagogical; it reflected a managerial worldview grounded in industrial-era production, mass markets, and relatively stable consumer preferences. The 4P framework assumes that firms are active designers of market offerings and that consumers respond predictably to changes in these variables. While these assumptions have been challenged, they remain analytically useful for understanding how firms construct value propositions and compete within defined market structures.

Product as a Strategic Value Proposition

Within the 4P framework, Product represents more than a physical good; it embodies the firm’s interpretation of customer needs and its technological and organizational capabilities. At an advanced level of analysis, product strategy encompasses core benefits, augmented features, design, branding, and lifecycle management. Products function as repositories of both functional and symbolic value, signaling quality, status, and identity. In contemporary markets, the product increasingly includes intangible elements such as software updates, data integration, and ecosystem compatibility. Thus, product decisions are inseparable from innovation strategy, intellectual property management, and long-term competitive positioning.

Price as an Expression of Value and Power

Price occupies a unique position in the marketing mix because it directly generates revenue while simultaneously communicating value. Traditional economic perspectives treat price as a function of cost structures and demand elasticity, but strategic marketing views price as a signal shaped by brand positioning, competitive dynamics, and customer perceptions of fairness. Advanced scholarship emphasizes that pricing reflects power relations between firms, intermediaries, and consumers. Dynamic pricing, subscription models, and freemium strategies illustrate how price has evolved from a static variable into a strategic lever embedded in broader business models. In this sense, price is not merely a tactical decision but a reflection of how value is created and captured over time.

Place and the Architecture of Market Access

Place refers to the channels through which products and services reach customers, encompassing logistics, distribution partners, and retail or digital interfaces. Historically, place decisions were constrained by physical infrastructure and geographic boundaries. In contemporary contexts, digital platforms, omnichannel strategies, and direct-to-consumer models have transformed place into a question of customer experience design. From a PhD-level perspective, place is best understood as an architecture of access that shapes information flows, transaction costs, and relational proximity between firms and customers. Distribution choices increasingly influence brand meaning and competitive advantage rather than simply determining availability.

Promotion and the Construction of Meaning

Promotion traditionally includes advertising, sales promotion, public relations, and personal selling. At a deeper analytical level, promotion is the process by which firms construct and disseminate meaning in markets. Rather than simply informing or persuading, promotional activities participate in cultural narratives, identity formation, and social discourse. The rise of digital media, influencer marketing, and algorithmic targeting has blurred the boundaries between promotion, product, and place. Promotion now operates as an interactive and data-driven process, reinforcing the need to view the marketing mix as an integrated system rather than a set of independent variables.

The Expansion to the 7P Framework in Services Marketing

The transition from the 4P to the 7P framework reflects structural changes in advanced economies, where services account for the majority of value creation. Scholars of services marketing argued that the original mix failed to capture the experiential, relational, and processual nature of services. The addition of People, Process, and Physical Evidence acknowledges that value in services is co-created through interactions rather than embedded solely in outputs. This expansion does not replace the 4P framework but extends it to contexts where intangibility, simultaneity, and variability dominate.

People as the Human Interface of Strategy

People represent employees, managers, and even customers who participate directly in service delivery. From a strategic perspective, people embody organizational culture, emotional labor, and tacit knowledge. Service quality, customer satisfaction, and brand trust are often determined less by formal strategy than by frontline behavior. At an advanced level, the People dimension connects marketing with human resource management, organizational behavior, and leadership studies. Firms that align internal incentives, training systems, and cultural norms with their market positioning are better equipped to deliver consistent and differentiated value.

Process and the Design of Value Creation

Process refers to the systems, routines, and flows through which services are produced and consumed. Unlike goods, services are often experienced in real time, making process design central to customer perceptions of efficiency, fairness, and reliability. A PhD-level interpretation situates process within operations management and service design literature, emphasizing standardization, customization, and scalability trade-offs. In digital environments, algorithms and automated workflows have become critical components of process, raising new questions about transparency, trust, and ethical responsibility.

Physical Evidence and the Tangibilization of Intangibles

Physical Evidence addresses the challenge of making intangible services perceptible and credible to customers. This includes physical environments, digital interfaces, branding artifacts, and even documentation. At a deeper theoretical level, physical evidence functions as a semiotic system that reduces uncertainty and shapes expectations. In platform-based and virtual services, physical evidence increasingly takes symbolic and experiential forms, such as user interface design and online community cues. This dimension highlights how perception management is integral to service strategy.

Critical Reflections and Contemporary Relevance

Despite their widespread adoption, the 4P and 7P frameworks face criticism for being firm-centric and insufficiently responsive to dynamic, networked markets. Contemporary marketing scholarship emphasizes relationships, ecosystems, and co-creation, challenging the notion that firms unilaterally control the marketing mix. However, the enduring relevance of these frameworks lies in their adaptability. When treated not as static checklists but as heuristic devices, the marketing mix frameworks continue to offer conceptual clarity and strategic discipline. They serve as entry points for integrating newer theories such as service-dominant logic, relationship marketing, and digital platform strategy.

Conclusion: Reframing the Marketing Mix for Advanced Scholarship

At the doctoral level, the 4P and 7P Marketing Mix frameworks should be understood as evolving intellectual constructs rather than obsolete managerial tools. Their strength lies in their ability to organize complex strategic decisions into coherent categories while remaining open to reinterpretation. In an era defined by digital transformation, services dominance, and participatory value creation, the marketing mix continues to provide a foundation upon which more nuanced and context-sensitive theories can be built. By critically engaging with these frameworks, scholars and practitioners alike can better understand how firms design, communicate, and deliver value in increasingly complex markets.

Keywords:

4P marketing mix explained at PhD level, 7P marketing mix framework academic analysis, marketing mix theory and practice, services marketing 7P model, strategic marketing mix in digital economy, marketing mix framework for service industries, evolution of the marketing mix concept